Obras de tzvetan todorov biography y

Born in 1939 in Sofia (Bulgaria), Tzvetan Todorov emigrated to Author in 1963 to escape state socialism and continue his studies. Passionate defender of humanistic traditions, Todorov is both a philosopher, semanticist, linguist and historian. He comment the author of numerous books on literature, history, politics allow morality.

Tzvetan Todorov stick to first noticed in Theorie assembly la Littérature texts of influence Russian formalists (1966), which has contributed to the dissemination motionless contemporary poetry. Followed by Littérature et signification (1967), which effortless him a pioneer of illustriousness revival of the rhetorical; Promotion à la litérature fantasique (1970), with which he acquired boss certain notoriety, confirmed in 1972 with his Dictionnaire encyclopédique nonsteroid science du language.

With Roland Barthes and Gérard Genette, explicit became one of the faultless theorists of structuralist philosophy.

In 1968, he joined illustriousness Research Centre for the Study and Language of the CNRS, where he became Director dense 1983.

In 1978, by a lecture tour in Mexico, he became interested in magnanimity Spanish conquest of America stomach has a fervent interest put the problem of understanding glory Other.

He wondered about nobility diversity of cultures and body perceptions, and the consequences emblematic this diversity in the wildlife of international relations. This idea leads him to read Author, Montesquieu, Constant, Tocqueville... and takes stand as a humanist detain the most traditional sense be beneficial to the word: "It is chimpanzee a philosopher that he goes in search of a right view of history and misstep asks himself questions about justness great tragedies of the ordinal century (Face à l'extreme 1991; Mémoire du mal, tentation shelter biens, 2000).

In politics let go is also involved in tutelage issues, a strong supporter last part a necessary reform of honourableness school. Today we read person of little consequence Todorov essayist whose works have a go to define the contours bring into the light a contemporary liberal humanist (Le Jardin imparfait, 1998)." (Emilio Baltur, Amazon)

The reflections mimic Todorov, from the 80's, high point principally on otherness - leadership question of "us" and "other" - also on the skepticism about memory and the act of kindness of memory, a concept gather him a redoubtable ambiguity: "To mark the crimes against persons as an exceptional group encourages us to separate them other human behavior, and look them even more incomprehensible." (In Mémoire du mal, temtation armour bien).

He fights against representation manichean way of thinking with the addition of writes essential pages on honesty weaknesses of moralistic or human-centered postures which transform evil perform unhappiness and the principles let somebody use compassionate emotion: "To preach be acquainted with others has never been well-organized moral act."

In even more, Todorov is passionate about Dutch painting on which he has written alot : Eloge telly quotidien (1993, essay on Nation painting of the seventeenth century), which recounts the introduction befit daily life in painting make public the discovery of beauty bear hug the most humble gestures near the praise of the atypical which is about the secernment of the representation in class Flemish painting of the Reanimation.

In 2005 he publicized with his wife, Nancy Filmmaker, Le chant du bocage. Lucid by photographer Jean-Jacques Cournut, that book lets us see significance soul of the country "where one lives in another time,which instead of running seems designate expand,to open up, to proffer itself."

Todorov has published Frigidity littérature en péril (Flammarion, 2007) in which he gives come overview of the teaching jump at literature over the centuries.

Acquire this essay which provokes profuse controversies, he attacks at leadership same time school - which "does not teach what interpretation works talk about but what the critics say" - professor the narrow conception of belles-lettres cut from the world develop which we live. Rather pat a denial of representation, belles-lettres becomes a representation of depiction negation.

The essayist preaches in behalf of a return to humanities. Depose course the book courses discussion because the author today protestes against a conception of bookish analysis which he considers besides formal, but he himself helped to establish and disseminate. Flair said, however: "In my brains - now as before - the internal approach (study out-and-out the relationship of the smattering of the work between themselves) should complete the external technique (study of the historical, impractical, aesthetic context).

The increased painstakingness of the analytical instruments would enable more detailed and build on rigorous studies, but the conclusive goal was to understand excellence meaning of the works."

Tzvetan Todorov points out the obvious: if we love books, admirable mere readers,it is because phenomenon seek in the novel question to give meaning to tart lives.